From Erlang Community

Revision as of 08:26, 2 September 2006 (edit) Rvg (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 08:28, 2 September 2006 (edit) (undo) Rvg (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 27:		Line 27:
	In Erlang, an atom is exactly the same - a named constant. It does not have an explicit value, as an enumeration does. You cannot substitute a numeric value for a symbolic one - they are explicitly differnt. The atom ok is different from the atom OK (The one is in lowercase, the other in uppercase).		In Erlang, an atom is exactly the same - a named constant. It does not have an explicit value, as an enumeration does. You cannot substitute a numeric value for a symbolic one - they are explicitly differnt. The atom ok is different from the atom OK (The one is in lowercase, the other in uppercase).
		+
		+	Each [[Erlang Virtual Machine]] has an [[Atom Table]]

---

Revision as of 08:28, 2 September 2006

Most languages, including C, C++ and Pascal/Delphi one could write something like this:

enum operations {ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY, DIVIDE };

This would mean that you can declare a variable of type operation. It can only have one of the following values:

Enumeration	Value
ADD	0
SUBTRACT	1
MULTIPLY	2
DIVIDE	3

Note that each instance of an operation will have a value of between 0 and 3. This is what makes an enumeration special. It has a value. In reality the compiler only uses the numeric values for constants. You can usually (although I don't encourage it) use the numeric value instead.

In Erlang, an atom is exactly the same - a named constant. It does not have an explicit value, as an enumeration does. You cannot substitute a numeric value for a symbolic one - they are explicitly differnt. The atom ok is different from the atom OK (The one is in lowercase, the other in uppercase).

Each Erlang Virtual Machine has an Atom Table