Erlang/OTP Forums

Author Message

<  Ejabberd mailing list  ~  Looking for a XMPP-server

Guest
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:01 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Hello there,

we've reached the limits of the msn protocol an are about to migrate to
a jabber-based infrastructure.
So we're looking for a xmpp-compilant server which supports text, audio
and video-messages in 1on1 and conference-mode.

Unfortunately, there is no meaningful comparision-chart available.
So could you send us a featurelist of your software so we have a chance
to decide?

Kind regards

--
Marius Hanne
Development

Java. Mit Sicherheit.
Jenomics GmbH, Thalkirchnerstra
Guest
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:29 am Reply with quote
Guest
This will help you a little bit.
Guest
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:31 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Marius Hanne wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> we've reached the limits of the msn protocol an are about to migrate to
> a jabber-based infrastructure.
> So we're looking for a xmpp-compilant server which supports text, audio
> and video-messages in 1on1 and conference-mode.

audio and video chat is a client side feature, every xmpp-compliant
server should support it. xmpp lacks conference features especially when
it comes to audio/video. I'm also missing skype-like multi-user chat.

_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:52 pm Reply with quote
Guest
On 2/21/07, Marius Hanne <marius.hanne@jenomics.de> wrote:
> we've reached the limits of the msn protocol an are about to migrate to
> a jabber-based infrastructure.

Nice, another argument to switch is security and control; by using
public services like MSN your company information is done over the
public Internet using a third-party instant messaging server. With
Jabber, you can run your own instant messaging server inside the
company, behind a firewall.

> So we're looking for a xmpp-compilant server

ejabberd should be XMPP compliant.

> which supports text,

Any client will support this, and also ejabberd of course.

> audio

You need support for Jingle in the client, but I'm not sure if a
client already exists. Try for example Coccinella (
http://hem.fyristorg.com/matben/ ). Nothing special in ejabberd is
necessary.

> and video-messages

You need support for Jingle Video in the client, but I'm not sure if a
client already exists. Nothing special in ejabberd is necessary.

> in 1on1 and conference-mode.

See Multi-User Chat.

> Unfortunately, there is no meaningful comparision-chart available.
> So could you send us a featurelist of your software so we have a chance
> to decide?

There is a feature list and sheet on the website:
http://ejabberd.jabber.ru/features Also, do not overlook the feature
sheet: http://ejabberd.jabber.ru/features#links

--
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.
_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:55 pm Reply with quote
Guest
On 2/22/07, oliver oli <oliver.oli@gmail.com> wrote:
> audio and video chat is a client side feature, every xmpp-compliant
> server should support it. xmpp lacks conference features especially when
> it comes to audio/video. I'm also missing skype-like multi-user chat.

I believe someone wrote a module for ejabberd for this feature in the past...

--
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.
_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:30 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hello, Jannie!
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:29:37 +0200 you wrote:

JP> This will help you a little bit.
JP> http://www.jabber.org/admin/jsc/

One question: is there a XMPP server which can carry 50-60K simultaneous
connections? 100K? I don't mean GTalk Smile it's for my own usage.

--
WMBR, George Hazan


_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:41 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hello,
Le 26 f
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:08 pm Reply with quote
Guest
On 2/26/07, Micka
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:21 pm Reply with quote
Guest
On Mondaym Feb 26 2007 14:41 Mickaël Rémond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 26 févr. 07 à 10:16, George Hazan a écrit :
> > Hello, Jannie!
> > Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:29:37 +0200 you wrote:
> >
> > JP> This will help you a little bit.
> > JP> http://www.jabber.org/admin/jsc/
> >
> > One question: is there a XMPP server which can carry 50-60K
> > simultaneous connections? 100K? I don't mean GTalk Smile it's for my
> > own usage.
>
> Yes, ejabberd can and far much more than that. It has been tested
> with 600l simultaneous connections.
Sorry? 600? 6001? 600k?

--
Respectfully
Alexey Nezhdanov

_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:00 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Hello, Sander!
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:08:19 +0100 you wrote:

>> Yes, ejabberd can and far much more than that. It has been tested with
>> 600l simultaneous connections.
>> <http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd>
SD> Typo probably, it shhould be 600k:
SD> http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/angie_millions_users_instant_messaging/

Were them 600K separate IP connections, or a web server used some
caching/pooling/grouping? On which hardware they made these tests?

--
WMBR, George Hazan (ghazan@postman.ru)


_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:34 pm Reply with quote
Guest
On 2/26/07, Alexey Nezhdanov <snake@penza-gsm.ru (snake@penza-gsm.ru)> wrote:
Quote:

> Yes, ejabberd can and far much more than that. It has been tested
> with 600l simultaneous connections.
Sorry? 600? 6001? 600k?


600k or 600,000
--
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.
Post recived from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:44 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Hello,
Le 26 f
Guest
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:45 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Hello,
Le 26 f

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum