|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| crd at inversenet.com |
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 1999 9:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Claes Wikstrom wrote:
>Craig Dickson writes:
>>
>>Incidentally, why is there no recognizer guard for funs? If you don't mind
>>having your code assume that a fun is a certain type of record, you can
use
>>record/2, but I don't recall the standard saying that funs had to be
>>implemented as records, so I'm not comfortable with that.
>
> There is, the guard test function(F) exists [...]
Okay, thanks. This guard BIF does not seem to be mentioned in the Erlang 0.7
draft specification.
Craig
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|