| Author |
Message |
< Yaws mailing list ~ SOAP client operation and binding and HTTP proxy |
| Guest |
 Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:54 am |
 |
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
I am using the SOAP client in yaws_soap_lib, since it supports WSDL. Very nice, by the way.
I just had two issues while using it:
1. It does not support requests through HTTP proxies, and even overwrites the HTTP settings I set before. I made a small hack (using the process dictionary), but a permanent solution would be nice.
2. In the WSDL I got, the name of the operation is not the same as the name of the request message. These should be related in the binding, but the binding is not available in the WSDL model (from yaws_soap_lib:initModel/1), so it cannot even be used. I had to make the name of the operation the same as the name of the request message in order to get it working. The current version will try to make a message of a type that is the same as the operation, but this is usually (I would say) not correct. So I think the binding should be preserved in the model, perhaps with the operation. This would require changes in the records, I guess, so I made an alternative WSDL and modified the operation name. I am not sure what the impact of modifications of the records would be, so I kept away from that.
Could this be fixed in a new version? Or should I implement a fix (when I have time, i.e. not this week, that's why I made the hacks), send it in, and see it integrated in the "official" version?
Regards,
*Erik.
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Willem |
| Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 3:48 pm |
|
|
|
User
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 59
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 7:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| chandru.m |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
User
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 85
|
Hi Erik,
Fixed in the attached patch to ibrowse.erl - I've checked this into
jungerl as well.
thanks for reporting it.
Chandru
2008/5/21 Erik Reitsma <erik.reitsma@ericsson.com>:
> Hi Willem,
>
> 1.
> I studied it some more.
> It appears that ibrowse does not take configured proxy options into account,
> and they should be passed directly in the call to ibrowse:send_req/5.
> Strange. When I pass the options directly to ibrowse:send_req/5 it works,
> but if I put them in a config file (verified by ibrowse:get_config_value/1),
> they are not used. I guess I could consider this a bug in ibrowse instead.
> I have not looked at the inets case again, but I use ibrowse already, and I
> cannot specify that I would like to use inets instead.
>
> 2.
> I hope I will have time to look into the binding next week or so. If you
> have done something before that, let me know so I don't have to dig into it.
>
> Regards,
> *Erik.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Willem de Jong [mailto:w.a.de.jong@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 5:47 PM
> To: Erik Reitsma
> Cc: Yaws-list
> Subject: Re: [Erlyaws-list] SOAP client operation and binding and HTTP proxy
>
> Hello Erik,
>
> Feel free to implement a fix, but I'll also have a look.
>
> Could you give me a bit more information on the first item? What breaks the
> support for proxies?
>
> Regards,
> Willem
>
>
> On 5/20/08, Erik Reitsma <erik.reitsma@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using the SOAP client in yaws_soap_lib, since it supports WSDL. Very
>> nice, by the way.
>> I just had two issues while using it:
>> 1. It does not support requests through HTTP proxies, and even overwrites
>> the HTTP settings I set before. I made a small hack (using the process
>> dictionary), but a permanent solution would be nice.
>>
>> 2. In the WSDL I got, the name of the operation is not the same as the
>> name of the request message. These should be related in the binding, but the
>> binding is not available in the WSDL model (from yaws_soap_lib:initModel/1),
>> so it cannot even be used. I had to make the name of the operation the same
>> as the name of the request message in order to get it working. The current
>> version will try to make a message of a type that is the same as the
>> operation, but this is usually (I would say) not correct. So I think the
>> binding should be preserved in the model, perhaps with the operation. This
>> would require changes in the records, I guess, so I made an alternative WSDL
>> and modified the operation name. I am not sure what the impact of
>> modifications of the records would be, so I kept away from that.
>>
>> Could this be fixed in a new version? Or should I implement a fix (when I
>> have time, i.e. not this week, that's why I made the hacks), send it in, and
>> see it integrated in the "official" version?
>>
>> Regards,
>> *Erik.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Erlyaws-list mailing list
>> Erlyaws-list@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlyaws-list
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Erlyaws-list mailing list
> Erlyaws-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlyaws-list
>
>
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Willem |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:04 pm |
|
|
|
User
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 59
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
