|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| Guest |
 Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:50 pm |
 |
|
|
Guest
|
Hi all,
The ability to exclude paths from a root appmod was introduce in the last release 1.86.
It works fine but when I play with embeded mode and try to fill myself the #sconf{} record, I got an error
in yaws_config:verify_upgrade_args functions.
I fill the appmods field with something like that where the third element of the tuple contains excluded
directories :
[{"/",myapp,
[["icons"],
["js"],
["top","static"],
["static"],
["bonjour"],
["bla"]]}],
but verify_upgrade_args always wait a tuple {X,Y} (when no excluded directories defined)
I patched this function to handle {X,Y} and {X,Y,Z} tuples .
did i miss something ?
thank you for help
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
wde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ability to exclude paths from a root appmod was introduce in the last release 1.86.
> but verify_upgrade_args always wait a tuple {X,Y} (when no excluded directories defined)
>
> I patched this function to handle {X,Y} and {X,Y,Z} tuples .
>
>
> did i miss something ?
No, you didn't - thanks a bunch, applied and pushed.
/klacke
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Erlyaws-list mailing list
Erlyaws-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlyaws-list
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:32 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
if I define an appmod for "/" with excluded paths, how to handle a request on "/" ?
Yaws seems to automatically transform the request to "/index.html".
Is that correct ? I have to handle a "special case" in my appmod for "index.html" requests ?
thank you
======= le 18/12/2009, 23:56:29 vous |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It's not really a problem, but if I understand the code of yaws_server :
Yaws calls try_index_file and do an I/O on disk and I don't want this
thank you for your help
======= le 20/12/2009, 12:31:50 vous |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I wrote this patch to handle a "/" request with a root appmod and excluded paths
======= le 20/12/2009, 12:44:03 vous |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:57 AM, wde <wde@free.fr (wde@free.fr)> wrote:
Quote: I wrote this patch to handle a "/" request with a root appmod and excluded paths
I wrote a new unit test to try to duplicate this problem, and unfortunately it succeeded. Your patch works -- applied and pushed.
thanks,
--steve
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
