|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| Guest |
 Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:36 pm |
 |
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Laurent Frobert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my boss wants me to explain why i want to choose RabbitMQ instead of Spread
> (http://www.spread.org/) or QWIDS (http://www.isti2.com/QWIDS/).
> Reason for him, is that Spread and QWIDS are well used in other production
> environment,
> so, what rabbitmq can give more ?
I used to use Spread, and a few things I didn't like about it were:
The network protocol isn't documented, you pretty much have to use their
supplied client libraries. The Python one is just a wrapper around the
C library, and it gave me lots of trouble with strange errors. AMQP has
lots of libraries in various languages now.
No real access control, anyone that connected could send and receive
anything. AMQP gives some control over that.
AMQP has topic exchanges, so you can filter out the messages you want
more easily - Spread didn't have anything like that when I was using it.
Just my 2 cents.
Barry
_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
